<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Star Trek &#8211; Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fleetyard.net/star-trek-review/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fleetyard.net/star-trek-review/</link>
	<description>A blog about Star Trek and science fiction.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 01:56:28 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dwight Williams</title>
		<link>http://fleetyard.net/star-trek-review/comment-page-1/#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator>Dwight Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 03:29:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fleetyard.net/?p=218#comment-190</guid>
		<description>Dave: I think you&#039;re right about Remus. Two-body Trojan system, after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave: I think you&#8217;re right about Remus. Two-body Trojan system, after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dwight Williams</title>
		<link>http://fleetyard.net/star-trek-review/comment-page-1/#comment-189</link>
		<dc:creator>Dwight Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 03:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fleetyard.net/?p=218#comment-189</guid>
		<description>My understanding is that the &quot;original&quot; timeline still exists alongside the &quot;new&quot; one and will continue to do so. Granted that the movie crews don&#039;t &lt;i&gt;have&lt;/i&gt; to respect what&#039;s being done in novels and online gaming for the franchise. They do seem to want to leave that particular door open based on interview quotes from elsewhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My understanding is that the &#8220;original&#8221; timeline still exists alongside the &#8220;new&#8221; one and will continue to do so. Granted that the movie crews don&#8217;t <i>have</i> to respect what&#8217;s being done in novels and online gaming for the franchise. They do seem to want to leave that particular door open based on interview quotes from elsewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: João Paulo Cursino</title>
		<link>http://fleetyard.net/star-trek-review/comment-page-1/#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>João Paulo Cursino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 15:37:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fleetyard.net/?p=218#comment-185</guid>
		<description>Ummm, Harry... Er... Vulcan &quot;imploded&quot;, not &quot;exploded&quot;...

Otherwise -- I am surprised with how much I agree with you. Maybe we think alike! Maybe we are trekkers alike.

And, oh yes, I have admired your work for a few years now. Keep on innovating!

Yours,

JP</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ummm, Harry&#8230; Er&#8230; Vulcan &#8220;imploded&#8221;, not &#8220;exploded&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>Otherwise &#8212; I am surprised with how much I agree with you. Maybe we think alike! Maybe we are trekkers alike.</p>
<p>And, oh yes, I have admired your work for a few years now. Keep on innovating!</p>
<p>Yours,</p>
<p>JP</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://fleetyard.net/star-trek-review/comment-page-1/#comment-184</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 02:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fleetyard.net/?p=218#comment-184</guid>
		<description>oh and one more thing ,no mention of Remus?

wouldnt that planet also have been destroyed being next to Romulus?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oh and one more thing ,no mention of Remus?</p>
<p>wouldnt that planet also have been destroyed being next to Romulus?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://fleetyard.net/star-trek-review/comment-page-1/#comment-183</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 02:28:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fleetyard.net/?p=218#comment-183</guid>
		<description>I loved the movie but was horrified at the destruction of both Romulus and Vulcan,the fact that the timeline was not restored left me feeling very nervous about the franchise&#039;s future,what are we paying those guys who inforce the Temporal Prime Directive for?

Well they did drop the ball on the whole Xindi thing,but still the loss of these two core worlds in the Star Trek universe? bad medicine I say

Now with this timeline the Alpha quadrant will be doomed to loose the Dominion war 

Also I wasnt thrilled with the Romulans looking like extras from Road Warrior I could see if the crew did that out of mourning for their lost homeworld but the scene on Romulus w/ Spock showed they too were bald .

I can only hope Q shows up and snaps the two planets back into existence in the sequel or those temporal agents who pestered Archer rescue Spock and help him do the job right the first time

I&#039;d prefer to see the Skorr or the Kzinti utilized in future sequels too ,if any both have lots of potential as adversaries

Still these complaints aside I really did love the movie</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved the movie but was horrified at the destruction of both Romulus and Vulcan,the fact that the timeline was not restored left me feeling very nervous about the franchise&#8217;s future,what are we paying those guys who inforce the Temporal Prime Directive for?</p>
<p>Well they did drop the ball on the whole Xindi thing,but still the loss of these two core worlds in the Star Trek universe? bad medicine I say</p>
<p>Now with this timeline the Alpha quadrant will be doomed to loose the Dominion war </p>
<p>Also I wasnt thrilled with the Romulans looking like extras from Road Warrior I could see if the crew did that out of mourning for their lost homeworld but the scene on Romulus w/ Spock showed they too were bald .</p>
<p>I can only hope Q shows up and snaps the two planets back into existence in the sequel or those temporal agents who pestered Archer rescue Spock and help him do the job right the first time</p>
<p>I&#8217;d prefer to see the Skorr or the Kzinti utilized in future sequels too ,if any both have lots of potential as adversaries</p>
<p>Still these complaints aside I really did love the movie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Wright</title>
		<link>http://fleetyard.net/star-trek-review/comment-page-1/#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Wright</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 21:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fleetyard.net/?p=218#comment-179</guid>
		<description>Nice write up, followed the link over from Doug&#039;s site, thanks Harry!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice write up, followed the link over from Doug&#8217;s site, thanks Harry!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
